![]() ![]() While we’re at it, let’s dump the confusing Electoral College and go for election by a simple majority of all Americans. And a one-term-only limit enables each president to focus on what he or she wants to achieve rather than worrying about re-election. A longer term enables the president to get something done. This is how it’s done in Mexico, for example. Elect each president just once - but for a six-year term.Making the Senate more democratic would mean that senators from sparsely populated regions could no longer hold up bills backed by the vast majority of voters. There’s no longer any justification for Vermont, with a 2010 population of 625,741, to have the same number of senators as California, with 37,253,956 residents. For example, every state could be guaranteed at least one senator, but not two, and allow up to four senators for the largest states. Make the Senate better reflect each state’s population.If a member of Congress didn’t face re-election every two years, he or she might have time to get something done. Extend House terms to four years, with half the House reelected every two years.Sometimes bills bill add the word “not” between two other words in an existing statute, but by reading it you wouldn’t know the subject matter or what’s being changed. By contrast, federal bills are hard to read and to follow, leading to lots of hidden legislation. The constitutions of a majority of states, including Washington, have this type of provision. Require that amendatory legislation set forth the entire section amended, and clearly show what words are being added and which are being deleted. ![]() Transparency in legislation will force Congress to take up-or-down votes on specific policy choices, so they can make choices and move on to the next issue for action. This prevents logrolling legislation with multiple topics to garner votes, and it keeps legislators from hiding unrelated subjects in the same bill. More than 40 states limit legislation to a single subject, and most of those require that the subject be clearly stated in the bill’s title. Add a “single subject” requirement for all federal legislation.In other words, ban the filibuster and require up-or-down majority votes on all legislation - no exceptions other than Senate treaty ratifications, impeachments, declarations of presidential disability, and constitutional amendments. Amend the Constitution to ban supermajority vote requirements in either house and secret “holds” that keep legislation from coming to a vote.Here are seven proposed constitutional changes that might help end the gridlock in Washington D.C. But a few structural changes could create a framework more conducive to democracy, transparency, and just plain working together to solve problems. Most Americans would also like to stop the practice of “logrolling” unrelated topics into a piece of legislation, and hiding substantive amendments in long and complex bills.Įnding partisan gridlock, and increasing transparency and real democracy, depends first and foremost on people - on lawmakers who are willing to listen to each other, willing to avoid knee-jerk responses to the other party’s proposals, and willing to compromise. For example, people are also tired of Senate filibusters and the practice of anonymous “holds” by senators that block legislation and confirmations. Voters also agree that Congressional operations could stand to be a lot more transparent. Almost all American voters - both Democrats and Republicans - readily agree on one thing: It’s time to end partisan bickering and gridlock in Washington D.C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |